27 Comments

Army Chaplain Kits

(More on military chaplain kits can be found at The Chaplain Kit website)

.

Longest Day Chaplain

British Chaplain with his Communion Set in “The Longest Day.”

Each chaplain is issued a chaplain kit when they complete their initial military training. Over the years they have been called by various names to include chaplain kits, field kits, field altars, etc., and have ranged from the very bulky and heavy to very portable. Perhaps the most well-known portrayal of a chaplain and his kit can be seen in the movie, “The Longest Day” when on D-day a chaplain is seen searching in the water for his heavy, non-floating, field kit. The chaplain portrayed in this scene, or from whose story it is inspired (Chaplain Sampson), went on to become the Army Deputy Chief of Chaplains and directed that a more lightweight and portable chaplain kit be developed.

Below are pictures of chaplain kits that I have, beginning with the one issued to me when I became a chaplain:

This is the current kit issues to Army chaplains. However, it comes in two smaller pouches, I've combined them into one

The current kit is the lightest and most portable to date.  It comes in two nylon cases, though I combined mine into one case for ease of transport (a 200-round SAW pouch, for those interested). It comes with everything necessary to perform a worship service with the celebration of Communion.

.

.

2013-10-18 11.17.45This next kit was used during the Vietnam era.  It is designed as a light-weight kit that has everything needed to perform a worship service with the celebration of communion, including having candles! I’ve been told that it also floats, to avoid loosing it in situations where you may find yourself in water!

2013-10-23 10.34.41

A look inside of the new kit I just received from a chaplain friend. This is a new (in box) kit of this era which came with everything they were originally issued with so is complete and “like new”!

As much as this kit is smaller and lighter than the previous kits which were metal and even more transportable than the WW2 kits, it still wasn’t perfect. I just learned today that during the U.S. invasion of Grenada, the chaplains were not permitted to jump with these chaplain kits because of their size. Further, they could not be added to the airdrops since ammunition was deemed as more important to the mission(!). “Space and weight

The new kit I received all packed up and ready to go. Still too large for an Airborne jump though!

The new kit I received all packed up and ready to go. Still too large for an Airborne jump though!

limitations were very critical to the Ranger Battalion.  Ranger chaplains therefore had to take as little equipment as possible. Chaplain Mack modified his chaplain’s kit to a small demolition bag carrying a communion cup and a host container plus some New Testaments, a Jewish Prayer Book, and rosary beads. Sacramental wine was carried in an extra canteen.”1 Not long after this operation, the new, even smaller, chaplain kit was developed which could be either worn on the pistol belt or attached to a rucksack enabling chaplains to carry them along during parachute jumps...

.

62-kit-3As we move back in time, we see the kits get more bulky and heavy. This kit comes in a metal box and has altarware that is larger and heavier, though it provides a more satisfying set-up.  This kit began being issued following the Korean War. This particular one is dated 1962.

.

.

2013-10-21 14.34.28I just picked up another kit from a chaplain friend who offered it to me after hearing me talking about buying a different kit.  He was on deployment in Saudi Arabia providing religious support to the U.S. Military Training Mission (USMTM) near Riyadh when they were closing things down and was told to take what he 2013-10-21 14.36.43could/wanted.  He was only able to grab this kit which he thought he may later like to have, but told me that I would appreciate it better than he would. On the outside is marked in white “USMTM “C” Kit.”  The inside has foam for storing the pieces, which aren’t all there.  It seems that missing are the candlesticks, the lid to the ciborium, the chalice paten, the glass individual communion cups and the cloths; but it does have an extra communion paten. Combined with another kit I had, it looks like this:

2013-10-21 99

.

.

IMG_5840I recently bought a new chaplain kit, my oldest!  This one is from World War 2 and seems to be in great condition.  I haven’t received it yet but here are a couple of pictures they sent me before I bought it.  By the way, my getting this kit almost seems providential!  Someone came across this post when they were performing an Internet search for WW2 Chaplain

IMG_5842Kits.  It turns out that her father, who is a retired UMC minister, was given this kit from a friend who found it in the attic of a house that they bought.  It looks like a retired chaplain stored it away, to be found half a century later . . . so that I could get it and preserve it for future generations to enjoy!

.

.

WW2-Ind-cup-kit-aThis next kit was used primarily by Navy chaplains on transport ships. I’m still trying to find out if they may have been used by some Army chaplains. They began making this particular kit for World War Two but they continued to be used through the Korean War and into the Vietnam War. It consists of individual cup communion trays, two bread trays and a nice chalice. 

WW2-Ind-cup-kit-bOn the outside, there is a large cross on the front and “US” by the handle. Some of the items that are in it are also marked with “US.”

This particular kit, while it shows signs of being used, is in very good condition.  I came across it on an online auction site as a “Buy-it Now” item but I made a lower offer and it was accepted!  Always nice to get a new kit for a good price!

.

.

WW1-a

I just aquired an interesting find from World War I.  I found this box which originally was part of the Homan’s Sick Call Outfit patented in 1897. By itself it wouldn’t attract my attention as a chaplain item, but what caught my eye was that on the back is written, “23rd Infantry 3 February 1918 France”! This sure makes it sound like a chaplain had used it. Whether he used it for last-rites as it was designed or as a portable field altar I am not sure. In World War I, Roman Catholic chaplains were issued a chaplain kit from the RC Church which continued relatively unchanged through World War II, though as it was larger, heavier and more bulky I could see why a chaplain may have carried this smaller set-up into the field.

Homans_Sick-Call_Outfit-Advertisement

Advertisment for the Homan’s Sick Call Outfit from 1897 or 1898.

An advertisement for this kit in a periodical from 1897 states that it “furnishes a complete altar for family devotions” so a chaplain could have used it to provide worship or celebrate mass for the troops.

Hopefully I’ll be able to find out more information on chaplain kits used in World War I and maybe even identify the chaplain who took this one with him on deployment to France. In the mean time, since the box came empty I’m working on replacing the articles that would have come with it which include a combination crucifix/candelabrum/ holy water font, two trays with “IHS” on them-one for salt and one for cotton, a bottle for holy water, a spoon-cup and a brush (I don’t anticipate finding the original cloths for it, though!

.

DSC00262All of the previous kits have been for Christian or Catholic chaplains.  This next kit is from about the era between Vietnam and the modern era, but is designed for a Jewish chaplain.  Missing from this kit are the Torah scrolls and the yad.

.

2013-10-18 11.26.48Here is another Jewish kit but is a current issue. This one is very much lighter and more compact but has everything essential for a Jewish service. Unfortunately, it’s missing the legs to the Torah stand, but I’m working on getting these replaced.

.

.

.

3 of 3, Chalice kit

There were other smaller kits issued for more specific uses or distinctive faith groups.  This kit was essentially for a more “liturgical” celebration of the Eucharist.  It includes a chalice, cruet plate and two cruets.  I believe that there is at least one or two pieces that my kit is lacking (the ciborium and communion paten).

.

.

DSC00260Another small, specific kit that I have seems to be for small-group communion, perhaps for hospital visitation or squad-size worship.  It comes with an individual cup communion tray.

.

.

.

Army_Chaplain_StolesRelated to the chaplain kits, but issued separately these days, are the chaplain stoles that are worn by chaplains in worship or during certain funerals or Memorial Ceremonies or Services.  The three that I have include the one issued to me (far right), one issued during World War Two (far left) and one used during the Vietnam era (center).

All of the kits, equipment and supplies are issued or provided to chaplains, not to endorse or establish any particular religion, but to enable chaplains to provide for the free exercise of religion for the Soldiers in their unit. Chaplains either perform worship services according to their religious tradition (in the field, often using the chaplain kits seen in this post), or provide chaplains and/or worship opportunities in other faith traditions to allow as many Soldiers in the unit as possible to worship as they desire.  However, it is also the chaplain’s duty to ensure that Soldiers who do not desire to worship or practice any particular religious rite are not required or unduly persuaded to do so. It is the chaplain who the commander relies on to ensure the Constitutional right of every Soldier to worship according to the dictates of their own conscience.

.

(More on military chaplain kits can be found at The Chaplain Kit website)

.

.

1 Brinsfield, John W., Jr. “Encouraging Faith, Supporting Soldiers: The United States Army Chaplaincy, 1875-1995. Part Two.” Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief of Chaplains, Department of the Army, 1997. 3.

5 Comments

Attack on Christians in the Military Rises to Level of Pentagon

chaplain corpsThis is a must read if you care anything about our military . . . or the Christian Church . . . or our country!

I was referred to this article at Breitbart.com about who the Pentagon is calling on for advice on religious tolerance.  This just shows how anti-Christian some of our leaders have become.  Read on (if you dare!):

.

PENTAGON TAPS ANTI-CHRISTIAN EXTREMIST FOR RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE POLICY

by KEN KLUKOWSKI (Breitbart News legal columnist Ken Klukowski is senior fellow for religious liberty at the Family Research Council and on faculty at Liberty University School of Law.)

“Today, we face incredibly well-funded gangs of fundamentalist Christian monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans by forcing their weaponized and twisted version of Christianity upon their helpless subordinates in our nation’s armed forces.”

Those words were recently written by Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), in a column he wrote for the Huffington Post. Weinstein will be a consultant to the Pentagon to develop new policies on religious tolerance, including a policy for court-martialing military chaplains who share the Christian Gospel during spiritual counseling of American troops.

Weinstein decries what he calls the “virulent religious oppression” perpetrated by conservative Christians, whom he refers to as “monstrosities” and “pitiable unconstitutional carpetbaggers,” comparing them to “bigots” in the Deep South during the civil rights era.

He cites Dr. James Dobson—the famous Christian founder of Focus on the Family—as “illustrating the extremist, militant nature of these virulently homophobic organizations’ rhetorically-charged propaganda.” Regarding those who teach orthodox Christian beliefs from the Bible, Weinstein concludes, “Let’s call these ignoble actions what they are: the senseless and cowardly squallings of human monsters.”

Weinstein then endorses the ultra-left Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), who publishes a list of “hate groups.” Alongside truly deplorable organizations like the KKK, the SPLC’s list includes a host of traditional Christian organizations (for their support of traditional marriage) and Tea Party organizations (for supporting limited government). Weinstein says SPLC correctly labels them all as “hate groups.”

There are about 600 more words in this article that you should read.  Click here to continue reading at the Breitbart site . . . 

.

UPDATE:  

I received some information pertaining to these articles I want to pass along. I’ll post more info as I receive it.

From our Senior Army Chaplain Leadership:

Teammates:

After discussions yesterday with several individuals and offices we have confirmed that the media article was inaccurate.

I have not received any official statement for release, when/if there is a statement released – I will forward it to you all.

The claims by the MRFF were largely exaggerated, and the meeting that took place only concerned the USAF and USAF guidance (blue book mentioned).

There was one USAF Chaplain present at the meeting, along with the SAF JAG, and other officers.

Mr. Weinstein is NOT working for DOD; and NO Commission/Group was put together to advise on Religious affairs.

Please address the concerns within your formations – and direct our focus and efforts toward tomorrow’s National Day of Prayer, as an opportunity to pray for the Nation, and our Military.

Further Update:

Office of the Secretary of Defense Statement provided THU 02MAY2013 to Office of Chief of Public Affairs, and then to Army Office of Chief of Chaplains. Notice the careful definition of “evangelize” and “proselytization.”

Statement in Response to Media and Public Query:

“The U.S. Department of Defense has never and will never single out a particular religious group for persecution or prosecution. The Department makes reasonable accommodations for all religions and celebrates the religious diversity of our service members.

Service members can share their faith (evangelize), but must not force unwanted, intrusive attempts to convert others of any faith or no faith to one’s beliefs (proselytization).

If a service member harasses another member on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, or disability, then the commander takesaction based on the gravity of the occurrence. Likewise, when religious harassment complaints are reported, commanders take action based on the gravity of the occurrence on a case by case basis.

The Department of Defense places a high value on the rights of members of the Military Services to observe the tenets of their respective religions and respects (and supports by its policy) the rights of others to their own religious beliefs, including the right to hold no beliefs. The Department does not endorse any one religion or religious organization, and provides free access of religion for all members of the military services.
We work to ensure that all service members are free to exercise their Constitutional right to practice their religion — in a manner that is respectful of other individuals’ rights to follow their own belief systems; and in ways that are conducive to good order and discipline; and that do not detract from accomplishing the military mission.”

Leave a comment

Distrust of Science Not Just Among the Uneducated

Creation-hands-LOver the last several weeks, I have posted several responses to the essays being posted by the Nazarenes Exploring Evolution website.  According to this site, those behind it seem concerned about the wide disparity between Nazarenes in the pews and Nazarenes serving as educators and scholars.  The clear implication from this site, and the essays posted on it, is that those who have had the opportunity to receive more education have been able to come to a proper understanding of Scripture and science which, they say, points to accepting Theistic Evolution instead of the Biblical narrative of creation.

A recent study posited at the American Sociological Association seems to present a different perspective on the role of education as it involves one’s acceptance or mistrust of the scientific community.  While the study was not focused on religion, evolution or beliefs, but rather on the three political views (Liberal, Moderate and Conservative) and how these three have viewed science over the last 40 years.

According to this study, Liberal’s and Moderate’s trust in science has remained essentially unchanged since 1974 (the start of the study period) while Conservative’s trust in science has plummeted over the last 25-30 years.  What is more telling about this distrust of science among Conservatives is not so much the plummet, but that it is mainly among Conservatives who are more educated, holding either bachelor or graduate degrees, including a significant enough amount of church-goers to be referred to in the study.

Liberal commentators such as found at Mother Jones suggest that it is the “Conservative elites” who have led the way to this mistrust of science with “rank-and-file” Conservatives blindly following along.  I’m not certain this study supports that conclusion, but rather that Conservatives are becoming more educated and therefore trusting the modern science establishment less. Coupled with this, it could also be that educated Conservatives are trusted more than the science establishment, causing the rank-and-file to accept and adopt their views.

Whatever the explanation for the growing mistrust which Conservative church-goers hold toward science, I think this study reveals that the premise held by those involved with the Nazarenes Exploring Evolution site is faulty, that it is not that the uneducated laymen in the pew need to be brought up to speed with modern science. I think they fail to recognize (or admit) that it is more likely that educated Nazarenes are studying science and finding it lacking in convincing arguments sufficient enough to merit their reinterpretation of Scripture to deny the ability of God to create as Genesis describes and communicate that process to the ancient writers of Scripture.

.

.

Previous posts responding to Nazarenes Exploring Evolution :

“Godless Evolution?” A Response to Rob Staples’ Essay at Nazarenes Exploring Evolution

“Conversations on Evolution and Christian Faith” a Response to Dan Boone’s Essay at Nazarenes Exploring Evolution

“Faith Seeking Understanding” A Response to Bob Branson’s Essay at Nazarenes Exploring Evolution

“Creation, Incarnation, and Evolution” A Response to Mark Mann’s Essay at Nazarenes Exploring Evolution

“Take Scripture Seriously” A Response to Shea Zellweger’s Essay at Nazarenes Exploring Evolution

.

.

Leave a comment

A Fresh Look at the Christianity of Johnny Cash

(from http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/712rU41j7eL._SL290_.jpg)I think that I have always liked Johnny Cash’s music, maybe more since the time I was less than a stone’s throw away from him at a Christian Booksellers Association (CBA) convention which he was at because he was the official spokesperson for the Franklin Electronic Bible, or maybe it was the release of the videos from the Holy Land-or the New Testament recordings; I don’t remember, it’s been a while!  Any of these appearances, though, would have been because of his public Christian faith.

Since Walk the Line was released on DVD, I returned to the Cash music I loved and even bought more. I knew that there was a Godly influence in the singer’s life, but I wasn’t aware of how much.  Other than my hearing his music and seeing him at the CBA convention, I knew little about his life and like many others, pretty much accepted the Hollywood version-even being encouraged about he “church” scene when he finally got his life turned around with the help of June Carter.

Clearly though, Hollywood doesn’t have Christianity’s interest in mind when producing their products. Neither do they have any concern about including God’s influence in the people’s lives they portray. Had they included the actual relationship which Johnny Cash had with the Savior, they would have lost revenue and unintentionally helped to spread the good news that even though people have ups and downs in their lives, God can still be active and working and bring about a life-change that makes a difference. This would be anathema for Hollywood executives.

I came across a good article about how Hollywood dismissed Johnny Cash’s faith in God when they produced Walk the Line. I wanted to share it for two reasons:  1) It helped me to better understand how involved God was in Cash’s life, so it may give you new insight as well. 2) It is another illustration of why we should be wary of Hollywood’s work and not blindly take their portrayals as fact.

I offer the article here without edit or comment, maintaining the links (I only leave out the internal ads).  I imported the whole article instead of linking to it because of some of the ads at the site I don’t want to be responsible for leading you to, but full credit for the following article goes to National Review Online and the author Lee Habeeb (vice-president of content at Salem Radio Network).

.

How Hollywood De-Christianized Johnny Cash

By Lee Habeeb

Lee Habeeb

It’s an early scene in the 2005 Johnny Cash biopic,Walk the Line. The young Cash, played by Joaquin Phoenix, is auditioning for the man who might make him the next Elvis Presley. That man was Sam Phillips, the Sun Records impresario from Memphis.

The fictional Cash walks into the room and begins playing a Gospel song. The fictional Phillips is not impressed, and tells the fictional Cash that no one listens to Gospel anymore, and that he should play something more meaningful. More relevant.

Cash did. The rest was history.

Well, not quite. It turns out that Cash, who was born on February 26, 1932, didn’t stop playing Gospel music at all. Nearly a quarter of the songs he wrote were in some way about his faith or the Bible, and many others were influenced by his Christian worldview.

But there wasn’t a single Gospel song on the Walk the Line soundtrack. Somehow, the screenwriters left out that important dimension of his musical catalogue. And there wasn’t a single mention of the greatest love of Cash’s life: Jesus Christ. That’s a love story the screenwriters of Walk the Line just couldn’t wrap their minds around.

Yes, he loved June, the love of his earthly life. But she too loved Jesus Christ, and no doubt Cash’s love for her had much to do with her love for Him. That fact too was omitted from the movie.

Cash recorded the entire King James Version of the New Testament, performed at countless Billy Graham revivals, made a movie about the life of Jesus, and studied the Bible as much as most divinity-school Ph.Ds. Somehow, none of that made it to the screen during the movie’s 136-minute running time.

The screenwriters left all of that out, and for reasons that are inexplicable.

Leaving out Cash’s Christian faith from his life story is like leaving out half-naked 19-year-old girls from Hugh Hefner’s. It’s like telling the story of Jackie Robinson without ever mentioning race or segregation.

The tension between the flesh and spirit, between things of this earth and things of heaven, animated all of Cash’s music. It’s what drew audiences to him generation after generation. Sin and redemption, good and evil, selfishness and love, and the struggles of living by a standard set not by man but by God — all were driving forces in Cash’s work and life.

While the rock-’n’-roll crowd was busy extolling the virtues of sexual freedom and rebellion, Cash was exploring eternal themes. Even his secular songs mined unusual territory for popular music. Here are the opening lyrics to his first No. 1 Billboard hit:

I keep a close watch on this heart of mine.
I keep my eyes wide open all the time.
I keep the ends out for the tie that binds.
Because you’re mine, I walk the line.

Not exactly “Shake, Rattle, and Roll.”

Cash wasn’t walking just any line. He was trying his best to walk a Christian line.

He sometimes succeeded and sometimes failed. Cash spoke openly about his bouts with drug addiction. He talked about his selfishness, and how he lost contact with God during those periods, and the toll those episodes took on his loved ones. On himself. “You don’t think about anyone else,” he said late in his life. “You think about yourself and where your next stash is coming from or your next drink. I wasted a lot of time and energy. I mean, we’re not talking days, but years.”

Believers and non-believers alike know about such struggles. That’s what attracted so many people to Cash’s music: his humility and his empathy. He had no tolerance for the false piety of many Christians, and he respected people of all faiths. And those of no faith, such as his friend Kris Kristofferson: The two simply agreed to not talk about religion.

Many great stories about Cash’s faith didn’t make it to the screen, but not because they were hard to find. Fans can find them in the remarkable biography by Steven Turner, The Man Called Cash.

One story that should have made it into the movie took place during a low point in Cash’s life, in the 1990s, 30 miles west of Chattanooga in the Nickajack Cave, an underground warren that’s home to over 100,000 bats. According to Turner, Cash spent time there earlier in his life, hunting for treasures such as Indian arrowheads and items left behind by Confederate soldiers. But on this occasion, Cash had different plans.

This is what Cash told the writer Nick Tosches in 1995:

I just felt like I was at the end of the line. I was down there by myself and I got to feelin’ that I took so many pills that I’d done it, that I was gonna blow up or something. I hadn’t eaten in days, I hadn’t slept in days, and my mind wasn’t workin’ too good anyway. I couldn’t stand myself anymore. I wanted to get away from me. And if that meant dyin’, then okay.

He was going there to commit suicide. And that’s when things got really interesting. Cash continued:

I took a flashlight with me, and I said, I’m goin’ to walk and crawl and climb into this cave until the light goes out, and then I’m gonna lie down. So I crawled in there with that flashlight until it burned out and I lay down to die. I was a mile in that cave. At least a mile. But I felt this great comfortin’ presence sayin’, “No, you’re not dyin’. I got things for you to do.” So I got up, found my way out. Cliffs, ledges, drop-offs. I don’t know how I got out, ’cept God got me out.

That would have been quite a scene in Walk the Line. But it never made it to the screen.

In August 1969, hundreds of thousands of young Americans gathered at Woodstock to watch Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young, Creedence Clearwater Revival, Janis Joplin, Sly and the Family Stone, The Band, Jimi Hendrix, and others perform. It was a wet and wild affair as the counterculture asserted itself into the mainstream. Just two weeks later, Johnny Cash closed out his music-variety show on ABC with a Gospel song. It was a remarkable version of “Were You There (When They Crucified My Lord)?” Always, to the end, Cash was a countercultural figure. Always a rebel.

Joaquin Phoenix as Johnny Cash (Twentieth Century Fox)

Joaquin Phoenix as Johnny Cash (Twentieth Century Fox)

Perhaps his most famous recordings were the ones he made in prisons, especially his two shows at Folsom Prison. Cash seemed at home there. He didn’t see himself as better than those men. He was just one of the guys, and understood the prisoners in ways they realized, without his ever saying anything. It didn’t hurt that he’d written some of his best songs from the point of view of condemned and convicted men. The inmates loved him for that. America loved him for that.

“He doesn’t sing for the damned,” Bono once commented about Cash, “he sings with the damned.” That was the true mark of Cash’s Christian walk: the empathy he had for the men and women often overlooked in our society. Prisoners; the hardworking field workers in rural America; the down-and-out and downtrodden; those of us struggling with personal demons, the kind that rob from us the best parts of ourselves.

When Cash got serious about his faith, and left the women and alcohol behind, some of his old friends were not very happy with him. “They’d rather I be in prison than church,” Cash admitted. Waylon Jennings was especially tough on Cash, according to Turner, accusing him of “selling out to religion.”

“He’d be attacked by agnostics and atheists if he appeared too pious,” explained Turner, “and he would be denounced by the religious community if he appeared too worldly.”

Talk about a tough line Cash had to walk. But he tried to walk it.

Cash was once asked how he was able to reach so many people with his message without ever hiding his faith. He had a simple, superb answer. “I am not a Christian artist,” he explained. “I am an artist who is Christian.”

Cash was revered by artists of every genre, from hip-hop to rock. Springsteen and Bono, Snoop Dogg and Trent Reznor all admired the openly Evangelical southern man. And all because Cash transcended stereotypes, and transcended musical categories.

He even transcended time, something few pop stars manage. His 2002 acoustic take on the Nine Inch Nails song about heroin addiction — “Hurt” — was about as courageous a recording as any ever made by a popular artist. Cash, who was 70, found an entire new generation of fans with that stark MTV video.

Thus was the universal appeal of the man called Cash. And that is the universal appeal of a man called Christ.

Steven Turner’s biography of Cash ends so beautifully that it is worth closing with his words:

The realm that Johnny Cash lived in was clouded by pain and colored by grace. He had the ability to transform the rough and commonplace into objects fit for heaven, just as he had been transformed. Rick Rubin remembers him taking Ewan McColl’s song “The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face” and turning it from a love song into a devotional song. “He loved that,” said Rubin. “It came really natural to him. It seemed like his devotion for life came from his devotion for God.”

— Lee Habeeb is vice president of content at Salem Radio Network.

.

.

Leave a comment

Is There a Future for “Holiness”?

cotn_doveI remember the days when we heard alot about the “holiness movement.”  I’m not too young to remember when holiness was the major theme that was both promoted by the denomination of which I am a part as well as regularly preached from the pulpit.  I remember when “Holiness unto the Lord” was more than just a catchy theme, it was a life lived.  I remember seeing people spend time at the altar rail then rise to testify to being filled with the Holy Spirit.

I’m blessed to be in a local church where the pastor is true to Scripture and preaches regularly on Scriptural holiness, calling us to true transformation from our conversion and spirit-empowered living; but sadly, I think that this may be becoming more rare in what used to be called the holiness movement.

At “The Voice,” I came across an article which discusses the death of the holiness movement as well as the hope of a new holiness movement.  I encourage you to read on and let is speak to you . . . inspire you.

You’ll notice that some of the cultural allusions date it a bit, but the truth it proclaims is even more pertinent to us today.

.

The Holiness Movement: Dead or Alive?

by Keith Drury

This article is an edited version of two articles by Keith Drury (“The Holiness Movement Is Dead,” and “Hope for the Holiness Movement”) -editor, Dennis Bratcher

.

The Holiness Movement is Dead

I owe a lot to the holiness movement. In 1905 I believe it was, or 1906, my grandfather, an immigrant coal miner, came from England to the United States and settled in Pennsylvania. His wife, Emmaline saw at the Five and Dime store, a woman who seemed different. The lady asked my grandmother, “Would you like to come to a cottage prayer meeting?” She had attended the Church of England all her life but since coming to America was not attending a church anywhere. She said, “Why, sure!”

And my grandmother, Emmaline Drury, got into a small cottage prayer meeting of the holiness movement. In it she found the Lord—she got “saved.” She didn’t even know what saved meant, but she got it.

She came home to my grandfather, Walter Drury and told him, “Walter, I got saved tonight.” My grandfather said, “Well, that’s fine Emmaline,” but inside he said, “We’ll see.” He always had come home from the mine and gone into the basement of that home in Elizabeth, Pennsylvania and taken his coal-dust clothes off. The very next day when he came home from the mine he walked up the basement steps, right into her kitchen, upstairs to the bedroom and took all his filthy, coal-black mining clothes off and plopped them on the bed. Emmaline followed him upstairs and without a word, cleaned it all up, cleaned up the bed, took everything outside and shook it out.

He did this everyday for two weeks! She smiled and with a sweetness of spirit, never said a word, and cleaned up after him every day. This was salvation folks, not sanctification! He was so attracted to her life that he went with her to the cottage prayer meeting. He too was saved—in a holiness meeting in Elizabeth, Pennsylvania.

So, I owe a lot to the holiness movement. My grandparents raised my father who became a holiness preacher, and now I follow in that path.

However, what I have to say today is not a collection of bright and cheery thoughts. It is this: We need to admit to each other that the holiness movement is dead. We have never had a funeral. And we still have the body upstairs in bed. In fact, we still keep it dressed up and still even talk about the movement as if it were alive. But the holiness movement—as a movement—is dead. Yes, I recognize that there are many wonderful holiness people around. And people are still getting entirely sanctified here and there. But as a movement, I think we need to admit we are dead. The sooner we admit it, the better off we’ll be.

We have a holiness heritage. We have holiness denominations. We have holiness organizations. We have holiness doctrines. We even have holiness colleges, but we no longer have a holiness movement. I, for one, lament the death of the holiness movement. But pretending we are alive as a movement will not make it so. In fact, it may be the greatest barrier to the emergence of a new holiness movement.

What happened to the holiness movement? How did the movement die? Who killed it? Was it a slow death, or did we die suddenly? Was it murder? Suicide? Why did the movement die? What caused its death? I wish to suggest eight factors, which contributed to the death of the holiness movement.

1. We wanted to be respectable.

Holiness people got tired of being different and looked on as “holy rollers.” . . .

continue reading (5240 more words) . . .

.

Leave a comment

Grown Children of Divorce: Another Challenge for the Church

In this day and age, there are few people who haven’t been touched by divorce in some way, even if it is simply having a friend or family member who has divorced. Divorce is a tragedy for all involved and while many view it as sin, it does not go beyond the possibility of forgiveness.  Unfortunately, forgiveness for the husband and wife who saw no other alternative, seldom brings healing to their children which is often manifested in their adult life when encountered by the claims of the Gospel or invitation of the Church.

Following is a good article reporting on a comprehensive study on the adult children of divorce with some hope for the future.  I have reproduced it in its entirety, with all links intact and without edit.

.

Fragmented Families

and the Future of the Church

by James Tonkowich

Did anyone ever read let alone preach a sample sermon I wrote on Malachi 2:13-16? I wonder. Most of us would rather not think about “Why God Hates Divorce.” Yet as the authors of “Does the Shape of Families Shape Faith?” — a new report from the Institute on American Values — write, “The health and future of congregations depends upon understanding, reaching out to, and nurturing as leaders those who have come of age amid increasing family fragmentation.”

Consider:

  • One million children live through divorces every year.
  • One young adult in four is a child of divorce.
  • “By the time they turn 15, 40 percent of children in the United States will confront the dissolution of a parent’s marriage or cohabitating relationship…”
  • While practicing Christians are less likely to get divorced that the rest of the adult population, 26 percent of Evangelicals and 28 percent of Catholics, many with children, divorce anyway.

While we can all cite examples of how their parents’ divorce turned some children to a strong and growing faith in Christ, that is far from the typical story. “We have learned,” the report notes, “that when children of divorce reach adulthood, compared to those who grew up in intact families, they feel less religious on the whole and are less likely to be involved in the regular practice of a faith.” Many have difficulty thinking of God as “Father” and they “stand at the leading edge of a generation that considers itself ‘spiritual, but not religious.’”

Why? Well, it’s all there in Malachi 2. God hates divorce because divorce not only tells a lie about God but it tells that lie to children, damaging their faith.

Throughout the Bible, God uses marriage between a man and a woman (the only sort there is) as a picture of his faithful and enduring love for his people. When divorce shatters that picture, the implication is that maybe God’s love isn’t quite as faithful and enduring as advertised. And that’s a lie.

Who hears the lie? Family members, church friends, and coworkers hear and are more likely to divorce if their friends are doing it and — most important — our children hear the lie.

Malachi wrote that through intact marriages God is “seeking godly offspring.” Marriage should result in children who follow their parents in a life of faith, hope, and love for God and neighbor. Divorce distorts godly offspring by telling children the lie about God in clear, painful and unforgettable terms.

The report mentions “Melissa, who found that a God she could not see and touch was too much like her own father, who lived on the opposite coast and did not respond to her letters. And Ashley, who as an adult continued visiting churches once a month, looking for a place where she might feel a sense of belonging, yet still not trusting that anyone could really understand her.”

Even, the report points out, in cases of “good divorce,” huge problems remain.

  • “The odds of religious attendance are more than twice as high for those raised in happy, intact marriages compared to those raised in amicable divorces.”
  • “Those raised in happy, intact marriages have the lowest levels of religious disinterest, compared to those raised in amicable divorces.”
  • “Those raised in happy, intact marriages are more likely to report an absence of negative experiences of God, compared to those raised in amicable divorces.”
  • “Those raised in happy, intact marriages are somewhat less likely than those raised in amicable divorces to identify as ‘neither religious nor spiritual.’”

Fortunately, “Does the Shape of Families Shape Faith?” doesn’t simply catalog bad news. Nearly a third comprises “A Plan for Congregations” with recommendations for pastors, youth ministers, parents, children of divorce, church members, and marriage ministries. This includes the most important strategy:

One of the most profound ways that we can support children of divorce is by helping there to be fewer children of divorce in the first place. It is more important than ever for churches to reflect deeply on their role as custodians of the marriage tradition, and to engage actively in preparing and strengthening congregants and people in the community to have healthy, lasting marriages.

God may hate divorce, but he loves the divorced and he loves their children. And God’s people can do no less.

“Does the Shape of Families Shape Faith?” — a free download — is an invaluable resource for more loving and effective outreach and ministry to the many, many people in and around our congregations whose lives have been impacted by divorce. Get your copy today.

.

.

This article originally appeared on Religion Today.  I came across it at Juicy Ecumenism.

.

13 Comments

Top 10 Reasons Our Kids Leave Church

Most of us are concerned about our children.  We hope and pray as they grow up that they will stick with the faith we tried to instill in them as they grew up.  Much of this “education” we leave to the Church, however, which isn’t always successful in making our hopes and prayers come true with our children.

I came across an essay by a guy named Marc Solas about this very point.  I don’t know much about him but he makes some good points that all of us in the Church should consider.  Let me quickly add that many of the points which he makes do not fully describe the church I currently attend, or have attended or pastored in the past, but all his points should give us something to consider as we seek to be the church God calls us to and further seek to preserve our children in the faith.

The essay, Top 10 Reasons Our Kids Leave Church, by Marc Solas is reprinted below without edit (though I did leave out all of his pictures -too distracting for me!):

.

Top 10 Reasons Our Kids Leave Church

We all know them, the kids who were raised in church. They were stars of the youth group.  They maybe even sang in the praise band or led worship.  And then… they graduate from High School and they leave church.  What happened?

It seems to happen so often that I wanted to do some digging; To talk to these kids and get some honest answers. I work in a major college town with a large number of 20-somethings. Nearly all of them were raised in very typical evangelical churches.  Nearly all of them have left the church with no intention of returning.  I spend a lot of time with them and it takes very little to get them to vent, and I’m happy to listen.  So, after lots of hours spent in coffee shops and after buying a few lunches, here are the most common thoughts taken from  dozens of conversations. I hope some of them make you angry. Not at the message, but at the failure of our pragmatic replacement of the gospel of the cross with an Americanized gospel of glory.  This isn’t a negative “beat up on the church” post. I love the church, and I want to see American evangelicalism return to the gospel of repentance and faith in Christ for the forgiveness of sins; not just as something on our “what we believe” page on our website, but as the core of what we preach from our pulpits to our children, our youth, and our adults.

The facts:

The statistics are jaw-droppingly horrific: 70% of youth stop attending church when they graduate from High School.  Nearly a decade later, about half return to church.

Half.

Let that sink in.

There’s no easy way to say this: The American Evangelical church has lost, is losing, and will almost certainly continue to lose OUR YOUTH.

For all the talk of “our greatest resource”, “our treasure”, and the multi-million dollar Dave and Buster’s/Starbucks knockoffs we build and fill with black walls and wailing rock bands… the church has failed them.

Miserably.

The Top 10 Reasons We’re Losing our Youth:

.

10.  The Church is “Relevant”:

You didn’t misread that, I didn’t say irrelevant, I said RELEVANT.   We’ve taken a historic, 2,000 year old faith, dressed it in plaid and skinny jeans and tried to sell it as “cool” to our kids.  It’s not cool. It’s not modern. What we’re packaging is a cheap knockoff of the world we’re called to evangelize.

As the quote says, “When the ship is in the ocean, everything’s fine. When the ocean gets into the ship, you’re in trouble.”

I’m not ranting about “worldliness” as some pietistic bogeyman, I’m talking about the fact that we yawn at a 5-minute biblical text, but almost trip over ourselves fawning over a minor celebrity or athlete who makes any vague reference to being a Christian.

We’re like a fawning wanna-be just hoping the world will think we’re cool too, you know, just like you guys!

Our kids meet the real world and our “look, we’re cool like you” posing is mocked.  In our effort to be “like them” we’ve become less of who we actually are.  The middle-aged pastor trying to look like his 20-something audience isn’t relevant. Dress him up in skinny jeans and hand him a latte, it doesn’t matter. It’s not relevant, It’s comically cliché. The minute you aim to be “authentic”, you’re no longer authentic!

9.  They never attended church to begin with:

From a Noah’s Ark themed nursery, to jumbotron summer-campish kids church, to pizza parties and rock concerts, many evangelical youth have been coddled in a not-quite-church, but not-quite-world hothouse.  They’ve never sat on a pew between a set of new parents with a fussy baby and a senior citizen on an oxygen tank.  They don’t see the full timeline of the gospel for every season of life.  Instead, we’ve dumbed down the message, pumped up the volume and act surprised when…

8.  They get smart:

It’s not that our students  “got smarter” when they left home, rather someone actually treated them as intelligent. Rather than dumbing down the message, the agnostics and atheists treat our youth as intelligent and challenge their intellect with “deep thoughts” of question and doubt.  Many of these “doubts” have been answered, in great depth, over the centuries of our faith. However….

7.   You sent them out unarmed:

Let’s just be honest, most of our churches are sending youth into the world embarrassingly ignorant of our faith.  How could we not? We’ve jettisoned catechesis, sold them on “deeds not creeds” and encouraged them to start the quest to find “God’s plan for their life”.  Yes, I know your church has a “What we believe” page, but is that actually being taught and reinforced from the pulpit? I’ve met evangelical church leaders (“Pastors”) who didn’t know the difference between justification and sanctification.  I’ve met megachurch board members who didn’t understand the atonement.  When we chose leaders based upon their ability to draw and lead rather than to accurately teach the faith? Well, we don’t teach the faith. Surprised?  And instead of the orthodox, historic faith…..

6.  You gave them hand-me-downs

You’ve tried your best to pass along the internal/subjective faith that you “feel”.  You really, really, really want them to “feel” it too. But we’ve never been called to evangelize our feelings. You can’t hand down this type of subjective faith. With nothing solid to hang their faith upon, with no historic creed to tie them to centuries of history, without the physical elements of bread, wine, and water, their faith is in their subjective feelings, and when faced with other ways to “feel” uplifted at college, the church loses out to things with much greater appeal to our human nature.  And they find it in…

5. Community

Have you noticed this word is *everywhere* in the church since the seeker-sensitive and church growth movements came onto the scene? (There’s a reason and a driving philosophy behind it which is outside of the scope of this blog.)  When our kids leave home, they leave the manufactured community they’ve lived in for nearly their entire life.  With their faith as something they “do” in community, they soon find that they can experience this “life change” and “life improvement” in “community” in many different contexts.  Mix this with a subjective, pragmatic faith and the 100th pizza party at the local big-box church doesn’t compete against the easier, more naturally appealing choices in other “communities”.   So, they left the church and….

4.  They found better feelings:

Rather than an external, objective, historical faith, we’ve given our youth an internal, subjective faith. The evangelical church isn’t catechizing or teaching our kids the fundamentals of the faith, we’re simply encouraging them to “be nice” and “love Jesus”.  When they leave home, they realize that they can be “spiritually fulfilled” and get the same subjective self-improvement principles (and warm-fuzzies) from the latest life-coach or from spending time with friends or volunteering at a shelter.  And they can be truly authentic, and they jump at the chance because…

3.  They got tired of pretending:

In the “best life now”, “Every day a Friday” world of evangelicals, there’s little room for depression, or struggle, or doubt.  Turn that frown upside down, or move along. Kids who are fed a stead diet of sermons aimed at removing anything (or anyone) who doesn’t pragmatically serve “God’s great plan for your life” has forced them to smile and, as the old song encouraged them be “hap-hap-happy all the time”.   Our kids are smart, often much smarter than we give them credit for.  So they trumpet the message I hear a lot from these kids. “The church is full of hypocrites”.  Why? Even though they have never been given the categories of law and gospel…

2.  They know the truth:

They can’t do it. They know it.  All that “be nice” moralism they’ve been taught? The bible has a word for it: Law.  And that’s what we’ve fed them, undiluted, since we dropped them off at the Noah’s Ark playland: Do/Don’t Do. As they get older it becomes  “Good Kids do/don’t”  and as adults “Do this for a better life”. The gospel appears briefly as another “do” to “get saved.”  But their diet is Law, and scripture tells us that the law condemns us.  So that smiling, upbeat “Love God and Love People” vision statement? Yeah, you’ve just condemned the youth with it. Nice, huh?  They either think that they’re “good people” since they don’t “do” any of the stuff their denomination teaches against (drink, smoke, dance, watch R rated movies), or they realize that they don’t meet Jesus own words of what is required.  There’s no rest in this law, only a treadmill of works they know they aren’t able to meet.  So, either way, they walk away from the church because…

1. They don’t need it:

Our kids are smart. They picked up on the message we unwittingly taught. If church is simply a place to learn life-application principals to achieve a better life in community… you don’t need a crucified Jesus for that.  Why would they get up early on a Sunday and watch a cheap knockoff of the entertainment venue they went to the night before?   The middle-aged pastor trying desperately to be “relevant” to them would be a comical cliché if the effect weren’t so devastating.  As we jettisoned the gospel, our students are never hit with the full impact of the law, their sin before God, and their desperate need for the atoning work of Christ.  Now THAT is relevant, THAT is authentic, and THAT is something the world cannot offer.

We’ve traded a historic, objective, faithful gospel based on God’s graciousness toward us for a modern, subjective, pragmatic gospel based upon achieving our goal by following life strategies.  Rather than being faithful to the foolish simplicity of the gospel of the cross we’ve set our goal on being “successful” in growing crowds with this gospel of glory. This new gospel saves no one. Our kids can check all of these boxes with any manner of self-help, life-coach, or simply self-designed spiritualism… and they can do it more pragmatically successfully, and in more relevant community.  They leave because given the choice,  with the very message we’ve taught them, it’s the smarter choice.

Our kids leave because we have failed to deliver to them the faith “delivered once for all” to the church.  I wish it wasn’t a given, but when I present law and gospel to these kids, the response is the same every time: “I’ve never heard that.”  I’m not against entertaining our youth, or even jumbotrons, or pizza parties (though I probably am against middle aged guys trying to wear skinny jeans to be “relevant).. it’s just that the one thing, the MAIN thing we’ve been tasked with? We’re failing. We’ve failed God and we’ve failed our kids.  Don’t let another kid walk out the door without being confronted with the full weight of the law, and the full freedom in the gospel.

Marc

.

.

This essay can be found in its entirety (pictures and all) at Marc5Solas.wordpress.com.  I haven’t read any of his other posts and don’t know anything about him, so I can’t give an endorsement or caution about his other posts.

4 Comments

From Dissatisfaction to Revival

whitefieldpreaching

George Whitefield Preaching to the crowds, 18th Century

Scholars have identified three or four Great Awakenings in the history of the United States.  These revivals of true religion always brought with them a positive and dramatic change to the communities which were involved, and to a great extent the country as a whole, as people who were lost and living in sin were drawn to Christ and the Church.  During these periods of Great Awakening, revivals would sprout up in various places and spread like wild fire.  Prior to each of these local revivals, a dissatisfaction with the way things were began to grow and spread resulting in multiple and extended times of prayer leading to changed lives and improved communities.

Wouldn’t it be exciting to be involved in such an awakening? From personal journals, church records and news reports we can get a pretty good idea of what it looked like . . .

It was in a community very much like ours, a church very much like ours.  This particular day started like any other, with one exception:  The people of the church were dissatisfied with the way things were.

Many wives who attended the church regularly had husbands who were unsaved, the women of the church became dissatisfied with it.   They had to do something about it no matter what the cost.

Many of the men of the church were very discouraged by the sinful atmosphere they had to work in.   They were dissatisfied having to work with unsaved workers, they had to do something about it no matter what the cost.

Several families in the church became dissatisfied living in a neighborhood with so many unsaved families.  They also became dissatisfied having even one unsaved child or loved one.

The Sunday School teachers of the church became dissatisfied with their low attendance and failing spirituality of their students.  They became dissatisfied with how things were.

Those who were dedicated to God in the church became dissatisfied with the world they lived in.  They knew something had to be done no matter what the cost.

Eastham_campmeeting

Prayer Meeting at Eastham (MA) Campmeeting, 1851

They began meeting for prayer regularly.  The prayer times kept increasing until they were meeting every day! Some had to get up earlier so they could get to the church to pray with others before going to work. Some gave up their lunch so they could pray with other Christians. Some gave up certain entertainments in the evenings so they could get together to pray.

Before long, they were feeling God more real than they ever had!   God was moving and working in their lives and community like never before.  Husbands started getting saved, coworkers, neighbors … all were coming to the Lord!  Children, aunts and uncles, siblings … were all being drawn by the Holy Spirit to be saved!

The numbers who came to pray kept increasing as more and more prayers were being answered and more and more of the unsaved were being converted.  People outside the church saw the dedication and concern of the Christians -and what was happening as a result- and flocked to church to see what was going on.  Preachers declared the Gospel message to packed church buildings and multitudes were saved and joined those in prayer for the unsaved.

Men, women, teenagers, children- all were driven to prayer as they saw what God was doing and better recognized the spiritually lost all around them.

Visitors to the area felt the presence of God so real, and took the dedication to pray which they found there home with them, where their church started praying daily, and God started moving and working in more places.

Whole communities felt the impact of the dedicated prayers of these people, and were shook to a saving knowledge of God.  Revival was spreading throughout the city, across the country, because a group of believers became dissatisfied and decided they had to do something about it no matter what the cost!

This story is one that was common place just before the great revivals in the United States broke out.  God used people who prayed to accomplish His will.  God brought a sense of dissatisfaction to those Christians and they had to do something about it, no matter what the cost.

So many people in the Church today have become satisfied with how things are. They’ve just accepted that many around them will be unsaved and live lives away from God. Many Christians have decided that they can’t do anything about the evil in their communities so have allowed themselves to become satisfied.

prayerI believe that God can do the same miraculous work today which He did during the Great Awakenings in the United States, if Christians will become dissatisfied and determine to see something done, no matter what the cost!  It starts with just a few Christians realizing that things need to change -that they must change; getting dissatisfied with the unsaved around them, in their families, in their communities then determining to pray, really pray, until something happens.

Are you satisfied?

.

.

2 Comments

Helping the Gospel Appeal to Everyone: Reflections on True Story by James Choung

 

choung-james

James Choung, author of “True Story”

Some of the primary concerns of young people today are care for the environment, relief for oppressed peoples, and the healing of other “systems” in their world that have been “damaged by evil” and are in need of restoration.  Being concerned, they often jump into the task of attempting to heal those systems without the power of God or assistance of the Church community which could help to bring tangible and eternal results.  James Choung, in his simple plan which he develops in True Story: A Christianity Worth Believing In, allows those seeking the healing of the world to find it through Jesus Christ and within the context of the “Big Story.”

It used to be that Christians could use a “one size fits all” witnessing tool and could expect results, but many in the world today, especially younger adults, do not see their greatest need as personal sin.  Often, the greatest need that they can articulate are problems in the world which Christians see are as a result of the fall.  Christians today who seek to evangelize this younger generation need an approach that addresses these needs.  I am not suggesting that we should minimize the importance of acknowledging one’s personal sin and seeking forgiveness for it, but I believe the wise evangelist will seek any common ground that can be found then bring the Gospel around from there.

The Big Story

The author, while not overly criticizing past models of evangelism, does show where they are lacking and presents a more comprehensive model.  He shares what he calls the “Big Story” of the Gospel message which he describes and illustrates in enough detail to be clear, but with enough simplicity to make it easy to share.  Each step applies to three levels:  systemic, relational and personal, allowing the reader or listener to find his/her position or need within each level and stage.

Designed for Good

The first step is Designed for Good (Though Choung states he usually begins with the second stage when sharing this model with non-Christians).  In this stage, we see how God created the world and humankind to function properly without “damage or shock,” in all three levels.  The world (systemic), their relationships with each other (relational) and their personal relationships with God (personal) are all described as being ideal (207).

Damaged by Evil

The second stage is Damaged by Evil.  This stage displays how the selfishness of humankind has damaged the systems of the world, the interpersonal relationships with each other and their relationships with God (209-210).  This is where many who are not yet Christians find themselves.  They see the damaged world and are seeking to improve it.  They see the damaged relationships in world areas where slavery or oppression is present and are active to make others aware and to urge governments to intervene. Sometimes, they even see the broken relationships around the world, around them, or even as  part of their own life.

Restored for Better

The third stage, Restored for Better, describes how God “moved into the neighborhood” on a mission to restore or heal what had been damaged by evil.  His coming allows for a restored relationship with Himself and better relationships with each other, but the systems of the world (now including the many offenses against nature and humanity) are still at odds with God’s ideal and in need of healing and restoration (210-212).  Choung brings out that as Jesus came into the world, He brought the Kingdom of God and offers those who would receive Him admittance into this Kingdom.

The driving force to this restoration through the Kingdom of God is that while total, ultimate and complete restoration is in the future, Christians (members of the Kingdom) should still be seeking as much of this restoration as can be accomplished in this fallen world.  This is why Jesus came, asserts Choung, to bring personal restoration of humanity to  God; to bring about reconciliation among humanity and to improve on the world systems that bring an abundance to life which Jesus promises.

Sent Together to Heal

The last stage is Sent Together to Heal and is the invitation to join in God’s mission with the community of believers to work toward the healing of the world and its systems as well as relationships between people groups that are at odds, and the relationship of others to God.  This is evangelism but it is also social action.  It involves the Community of Believers in the Missio Dei that God began and communicated throughout the Old Testament and Jesus continued and taught while on earth.

These four stages or worlds provide a visual for pre-Christians and Christians alike to find themselves and get on the right track in mission with God.  I believe that it is an excellent tool both for evangelism and for persuading the Church to get more involved with the greater work of God, beyond seeking converts to blessing the nations.

Weaknesses of True Story

True StoryIf I find any weaknesses in this book, they would be few.  The first would be using fictional characters to take the reader through the steps of the model.  This may just be because of how I learn, but I would have much rather been given the material up front, which comes in the last few chapters.  However, I can understand that the author likely used this method to show how explaining the “Big Story” can be accomplished effectively with people the reader knows.

I felt a bit manipulated with the fictional professor giving the lessons to the main character.  Stating her credentials seemed to be a ploy for us to accept what she said as true, regardless of whether it is or not, simply because the character was an educated university professor.

I also felt manipulated when the author had the main fictional character pray that if he learned something that is not from God, that he would forget it quickly, but something that is from God, that He would preserve it in his heart and mind (142).  Having this prayer in the story, then the character going to the fictional professor’s office to hear more of her teaching seems like an attempt to subconsciously make us accept as truth whatever the professor said and the main character remembered. The author does eventually share the rest of the story along with the references and sources for some of the statements made by the professor, but while reading the fictional portion, I was feeling manipulated.

I struggled also with the fictional professor’s analysis of Heaven being “all around us” as she equated Heaven with the Kingdom of God present (131).  With the absence of good Scriptural support, this seems a little off-center to me like the “Divine State of Mind” of Christian Science.  Later discussion of this topic does seem to clear it up some, when it is considered that truly the Kingdom of God is present with us (the “already”), while still a place with God in the future where believers will spend eternity with Him (the “not yet).

Probably the greatest concern that I have is that the model, as described and portrayed in this book, seems to make conversion as simple as buying into a cause or joining the team.  This, I think, would cause the loudest rejection from those who would say that the model described in True Story is just another attempt of the liberal Church to subjugate evangelism to the work of Social Action.  However, I do not think that this is the author’s intent and believe that a greater emphasis by the user on the actual conversion experience in step three, can remedy this concern.

There are a couple of other small concerns I had, mainly minor statements in the book which reveal the author’s theological background; but even combined with those mentioned above, are not sufficient to deter me from highly recommending this book.

good-news-jpegStrengths of True Story

I find this “Big Story” model to be of great value.  Over the last several months, I have struggled with how to bring together the primacy of evangelism from my Evangelical heritage and the need for a greater work to redeem the world beyond simply salvation, but also seeking reconciliation, freedom from oppression, and other ministries that are often viewed as the work of the “liberal” elements of the Church.  I find in this model the relevance I have been seeking which I believe those who are not Christians are looking for, yet Evangelical Christians can still accept.  It does not ignore the salvation experience for the promotion of the redemption of society, but rather  makes salvation the entrance to being a part of the work of being sent together to heal.

I love the way that the entire “Big Story” can be explained in a matter of a few minutes and can be illustrated on something the size of a napkin.  Like earlier evangelistic tools, this makes communicating it to others wherever the door is found open quite easy. Though admittedly, the communication of this story is more likely to take place over several conversations, much like the fictional characters in the book.

There is much more that could be shared from True Story that is positive and will engage the reader to a deeper reflection of the Mission of God, but space does not allow further exploration here.  I do think that the “Big Story” modeled in this book is one that the Church needs to hear and share with the young people in their community.  Those young people will continue to seek the healing of the world’s systems with or without the Church, but helping them to discover that God is concerned with many of the same issues they are, can be a powerful tool to lead them to Christ … and to continue the Missio Dei.

.

.

True Story:  A Christianity Worth Believing In by James Choung is published by IVP Books and is copyright 2008 by James Choung. More information about the author can be found at his blog site, jameschoung.net.  More information about the book, True Story can be found at the authors site or at Amazon.

From the back cover:  James Choung is divisional director of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship‘s San Diego Division.  A frequent speaker and seminar leader, he and his family live in the San Diego area.

.

3 Comments

The Millennial Generation’s Acceptable Sin

There is danger brewing in what 20-somethings in the Church believe is acceptable. Those of us interested in maintaining orthodoxy in the Church as well as enriching the spiritual life of our young people should take note.  Below begins what I think is an excellent article discussing this danger. It is written by Bart Gingerich, research assistant at The Institute on Religion and Democracy posted on their blog, Juicy Ecumenism.

.

The Millennial Generation’s Acceptable Sin

By Bart Gingerich (@bjgingerich)

Every human institution and society has its own list of sins and virtues that contradict the law of God. With the rise of the Millennial generation in evangelical churches, a vice is creeping up into the realms of acceptance, indifference, or at least resignation: fornication (i.e. extramarital sex or unchaste living).

A few decades ago, this was one of the main issues that evangelicals hammered in their social witness. The skeptical news cycle and entertainment industry mocked this often; they saw pleas for chastity as a laughable result of pietistic sexual repression and no small bit of hypocrisy. Theological leaders and other influential voices chided their fellow believers for obsessing over a select set of sexual taboos.

Now, however, the exhortations have eased off. Commentary from Tim Keller at the latest Q Conference in New York is quite telling. “We’re not doing well on the sex side,” he confessed. Talking about his church, Keller said, “We’re just like the rest of the city. If I preach like that [on sexual ethics], everybody gets real quiet.”

Similarly, the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy discovered 80 percent of unmarried evangelicals between the ages of 18 and 29 had engaged in sex. Using a more stringent definition of “evangelical,” the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) recently reported that 44 percent of millennial evangelicals had sex outside marriage. Of course, just because Christians oppose sexual immorality does not mean they never struggle with it. Nevertheless, in this sort of moral environment, harping on moral sex lives is analogous to starting an abolitionist church in the antebellum South. Thanks to the public liturgy of Hollywood and our own human inclinations, fornication has been normalized and poses a massive obstacle to effective pastoral ministry.

Please continue reading this article at Juicy Ecumenism ~ The Institute on Religion & Democracy’s Blog

.